similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to ccylab.com

Ccylab alternatives & similar sites

Chunchun Ye, The Ye Group at Nanyang Technological University (NTU) — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Science →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
kansaiuniversityreports.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Technology Reports of Kansai University \| TRKU	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aacrt2023.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Asia-Australasia Conference of Radiological Technologists	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
atse.org.au ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Australian Academy of Technological Sciences & Engineering	Australia en	science Umbraco	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
brandonboor.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Boor Lab at Purdue University	United States~ en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
neurocenter-unige.ch ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Geneva University Neurocenter	Switzerland en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kardashevdashboard.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Kardashev Dashboard - Explore Humanity's Technological Future	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
preservationtechnologies.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Preservation Technologies	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
favell.co.uk ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Home - Favell Technologies	United Kingdom en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cusap.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Students Against Pseudoscience – Based at the University of Cambridge	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
icgteta.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	International Conference on Global Trends in Engineering and Technological Advancement	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
katiekeegan.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Katie Keegan \| Emory University	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
simonfsoubeyrand.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Simon Faghel-Soubeyrand. Banting Postdoctoral Fellow at the University of Oxford.	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
globalwaterfutures.ca ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Global Water Futures \| University of Saskatchewan	Canada en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
csct.ac.uk ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	CDT in Sustainable Chemical Technologies - A Systems Approach	United Kingdom en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
discoveroceanography.co.uk ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Discover Oceanography \| University of Southampton	United Kingdom en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
americanlevitation.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	American Levitation – "Elevating the Future with Superconducting Technology"	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mcquillaninstitute.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	The McQuillan Institute - Science, Technology, and the Human Future	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
trinealumnipatents.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Alumni Patent Database - Trine University	United States~ en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.