similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to ccrp.dev

Ccrp alternatives & similar sites

CCRP: The Coalesced Chunk Retrieval Protocol | CCRP — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
myprotocol.io ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Early Access — My Protocol \| My Protocol	en	technology-and-computing	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
foneprotocol.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Fone Protocol \| Infrastructure for Real-World Decentralized Systems	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kanonak.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Kanonak Protocol	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kaspa-gdpv.net ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Kaspa GHOSTDAG Protocol Visualizer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mcpservers.services ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	MCP Server Directory, Tutorials & Protocol Reference \| MCPServers.services \| MCPServers.services	en	technology-and-computing	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
leave-her-alone.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Votive — Council Protocol — $VOTIVE · to wish · to vow	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
predicate.dev ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Predicate \| Predicate Specifications	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mcpevals.ai ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	MCP Eval - Test Your MCP Server	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
component.gallery ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	The Component Gallery	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
cmsmatrix.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	The CMS Matrix - cmsmatrix.org - The Content Management Comparison Tool	en	technology-and-computing Statamic	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
deanvelopment.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Deanvelopment: Digital Products for the Real World	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alpsrey.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Alpsrey Innovations \| Hardware Prototyping Studio	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
3db-labs.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	3dB Labs \| Advanced Signal Processing and RF Analysis Solutions	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
fixmyvibecode.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Fix My Vibe Code — We fix broken vibe-coded prototypes	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
laytononline.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Alexander Layton \| Professional Profile	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
joegiddings.uk ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Joe Giddings – Product Owner in the Cotswolds	United Kingdom en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
joegiddings.co.uk ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Joe Giddings – Product Owner in the Cotswolds	United Kingdom en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mediamods.biz ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	MediaMods	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.