similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to ccps21.org

Ccps21 alternatives & similar sites

Cambridge Centre for Palestine Studies | Multi-Discipline Research Centre — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Education →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
4socialstudies.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	4SocialStudies -- Search Engine for Social Studies Resources	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cssscal.org ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Centre for Studies in Social Sciences Calcutta	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
4humanities.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	4Humanities -- Search Engine for Humanities Research	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
curedu.org ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	The Center for Urban Research in Education	en	education Shopify	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mindsetscholarsnetwork.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Student Experience Research Network	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
constitutionalstudies.ca ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Centre for Constitutional Studies \| University of Alberta Faculty of Law	Canada en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
ideasuniuyojournal.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	IUJPMS - Ideas: A Uniuyo Journal of Philosophy and Multidisciplinary Studies	en	education WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
a-z-topics.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Research Topics by Discipline, Level, and Assignment Type	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
acwr.edu.au ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Australasian Centre for Wesleyan Research	Australia en	education Squarespace Squarespace Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
ctr4process.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Home - Center for Process Studies	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
digitalfuturescommission.org.uk ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Digital Futures for Children centre \| Researching children’s rights in digital environments - LSE	United Kingdom en	education	robotsllms ai humans	email phone	none
center-for-friendship.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	UCLA Center for Friendship Research	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bridgeequityresearch.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Bridge Equity Research — Student-Led Equity Research Initiative	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cssdisc.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	The Center for the Study of Scholastic Discipline	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
miriamsweeney.net ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Miriam E. Sweeney \| feminist research in critical information studies	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kansascouncilss.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Kansas Council for the Social Studies	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kansascouncilss.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Kansas Council for the Social Studies	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ioana-radu.ca ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Ioana Radu - Interdisciplinary Scholar	Canada en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.