similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to cchi-tn.com

Cchi Tn alternatives & similar sites

Cumberland Center for Healthcare Innovation | CCHI-TN — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Cancer →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
mcif.my ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Malaysia Cancer Innovations Forum	en	cancer WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
drhannah.net ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	DrHannah.net – Tips for Healthy Living	en	cancer WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
basichealth.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Basic Health International, Inc.	en	cancer WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gacore.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Georgia Cancer Info presented by Georgia CORE - Center for Oncology Research and Education	en	cancer	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pinkribbon.co ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Pink Ribbon \| Network for breast cancer prevention and cure	Colombia en	cancer WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thisismbc.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Metastatic Breast Cancer Information Center \| MBCInfoCenter	en	cancer	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
afaffoundation.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	AFAF Foundation \| Anything For A Friend	en	cancer	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
savannahsdream.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Savannah Walters Memorial Foundation \| Cancer Foundation	en	cancer WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
scorecharity.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	SCORE INTERNATIONAL	en	cancer Squarespace Squarespace Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
chordomafoundation.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Chordoma Foundation \| Home	en	cancer	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ctcancerfoundation.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Connecticut Cancer Foundation \| Helping Cancer Patients	en	cancer WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
siscr.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	SiSCR - Siriraj Center of Excellence for Stem Cell Research	en	cancer WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
we-bleed-too.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	We Bleed Too™ - Innovative Hematology, Inc.	en	cancer WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
medical-articles.net ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Health Begets Health - Healthy lifestyle choices with information and articles.	en	cancer WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
adamspector.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	The Adam R Spector Foundation \|	en	cancer WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dentonology.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Lauren Denton – Healthcare Leader \| Rural Health & Cancer Survivorship Researcher \| Advocate for Equitable Access to Care	en	cancer WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	full · 12
adcc.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Alliance of Dedicated Cancer Centers – Improving Goal Concordant Care Initiative	en	cancer WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
drelishafredman.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Radiation Oncology / Patient-centered Radiotherapy	en	cancer WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.