similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to cbrowser.ai

Cbrowser alternatives & similar sites

CBrowser | Persona Testing for Product Teams — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
vizelify.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Vizelify Charts — The Data Visualization Platform for Product Teams	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
batterii.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Faster, easier & more dynamic ideation tools for product teams - Batterii	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
davidsharkey.co ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	./sharkey \| Personal Site	Colombia en	technology-and-computing	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	full · 11
paperstick.app ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Hosted Changelog for Release Notes and Product Updates \| Paperstick	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
connoreaston.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Connor Easton \| Personal Website	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
365calling.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Unleash Call Routing for Microsoft Teams \| Contango	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
premmody.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Prem Mody \| Personal Portfolio	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
shungfei.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Shung Fei: Personal Site	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
alekforgrowth.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Alek Darr — Product Manager & Builder	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
paperscissorsandglue.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Paper Scissors & Glue — Senior full-stack practice for teams shipping real products	Romania~ en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mblackstock.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Mike Blackstock \| Personal Web Page	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
1trustreview.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	1TrustReview — One honest take per product. No filler.	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
eudiw.dev ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	EUDIW Testing Links	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
polor.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Sumix \| Fiber inspection tools for production and maintenance	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ethangorman.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Ethan Gorman — Product Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
alexlongmuir.dev ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Alex Longmuir - Personal Site	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
etesie.dev ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Etesie — Own Your Product Foundation	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
morganmueller.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Morgan Mueller \| Developer & Product Lead	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.