similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to catherinegonick.com

Catherinegonick alternatives & similar sites

Catherine Gonick | Split Daughter of Eve — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Poetry →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
catherinebuck.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Catherine Buck	en	poetry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	full · 12
catherineowenwriter.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Catherine Owen	en	poetry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
catherinebutler.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Catherine Butler	en	books-and-literature	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
catherineshonack.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Catherine Shonack	en	poetry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
catherinemccarley.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Catherine McCarley	en	books-and-literature WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
catherineclemente.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Catherine Clemente	en	poetry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
catherinevaughan.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Catherine Vaughan – British Poet	en	poetry WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
catherineharnett.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Home \| Catherine Harnett Writer	en	poetry Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
catherinehamrick.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Catherine Hamrick – Poetry & Creative Nonfiction	en	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
catherineabbeyhodges.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	CATHERINE ABBEY HODGES – Poet and Teacher	en	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dotipress.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Daughters of Thyme \| Poetry collective	en	poetry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
catherine-bateson.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Catherine Bateson \| Australian writer of books for younger readers, young adults, verse novels and poetry.	en	books-and-literature WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
catherineaotoole.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Catherine A. O’Toole – Writer, Poet, Marketing Director	en	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
catherineannehawkins.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Catherine Hawkins Knell – words and notes: thoughts of a writer, singer, and teacher	en	poetry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
catherinekeefe.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Catherine Keefe \| Writer. Teacher. Write, Right My Life Story Coach.	en	poetry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
catherinebull.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Catherine Bull – Poetry & Books (& A Little More But Mostly Poetry & Books)	en	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
howardschor.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Howard Schor – Writer of Words, Mostly.	en	books-and-literature WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
garyboelhower.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Writer of Poetry- Teacher- Workshop Facilitator	en	poetry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.