similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to castello.me

Castello alternatives & similar sites

Castello.me – Matter, Energy, and Life of Michaela A. Castello. — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Science →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
algolis.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Catalog of Life Energy Equipment and Accessories	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
amse.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	American Museum of Science and Energy – Inspire the Imagination	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
csr-bd.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Centre for Social Research-CSR – Bridging Science, Technology, and the Social Fabric	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
vizsi.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	VISUALIZE YOUR SCIENCE – TIPS, TRICKS, and TUTORIALS	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bayestats.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Stats is Life and Life is Stats	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
heroicatech.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Heroica Technologies – Next-generation photonics for energy, sensing, imaging, and more.	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mcdonnellinitiativeatmbl.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	McDonnell Initiative @MBL – Transforming discovery through collaborations among historians, philosophers, and life scientists	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
medianeuroscience.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Media Neuroscience Lab \| Research and Teaching at the Intersection of Communication, Technology, and Neuroscience	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
meeso.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Home – MEESO research project - MEESO	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mchristo.net ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Michael Christoffersen	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mcquillaninstitute.org ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	The McQuillan Institute - Science, Technology, and the Human Future	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
almaarifa-magazine.org ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Almaarifa – Magazine	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
beaufart.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	The Beaufart™ Bureau — Measuring What Matters	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
meetmatt.net ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Meeting Matters International	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
alertgeomaterials.org ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	ALERT Geomaterials \| The Alliance of Laboratories in Europe for Education, Research and Technology	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
algorithmiq.ai ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Home page - Algorithmiq	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
algorithmiqcomputing.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Home page - Algorithmiq	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
algorithmiq.tech ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Home page - Algorithmiq	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.