similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to carsonhinckley.com

Carsonhinckley alternatives & similar sites

Carson Hinckley - Full-stack Engineer & Engineering Leader — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
alexgutierrez.tech ↗	77 match 1 shared topics	Alex Gutierrez — Software Engineer & Engineering Leader	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
7pm.dev ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	7pm.dev \| Engineering Leader	en	technology-and-computing	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jackbishop.co ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	Jack Bishop \| Software Engineering Leader	Colombia en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
koushikdasika.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Koushik Dasika — Hacker, Builder, Engineering Leader	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
laughterconsulting.tech ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Nic Laughter \| Engineering Leader & Technical Consultant	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
albertoprietolofkrantz.dev ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Alberto Prieto Löfkrantz - Engineering Leader	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
albertoprieto.dev ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Alberto Prieto Löfkrantz - Engineering Leader	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alberto-prieto-lofkrantz.dev ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Alberto Prieto Löfkrantz - Engineering Leader	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alansaldivar.dev ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Saldivar Studio — Engineering Leadership & Product Development	United States~ en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
alexandreakira.dev ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Alexandre Akira - Senior Full-Stack Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hfreshnel.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	hfreshnel — Fullstack Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hidas.dev ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Hidas K C - Full Stack Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
heykll.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Eric Hyde \| Engineering Leader and Software Portfolio	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
hireclassicdevs.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Hire Classic Devs \| Full-Stack Engineering Group	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
m7md.co ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Mohammed Mahjari – Full-Stack Engineer & Co-Founder	Colombia en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alejandromartinez.dev ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Alejandro Martinez \| Staff-Level Full-Stack Software Engineer	United States~ en	technology-and-computing	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
pomodoroturntable.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Engineer Pal - Engineering & Technology Community	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dgeek.org ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Pankaj Yadav — Mobile Engineering Leader & Architect	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.