similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to capturedcarbon.studio

Capturedcarbon alternatives & similar sites

Captured Carbon Studio - About — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Environment →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
accruedcarbon.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Accrued Carbon	en	environment	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
naturefocus.com.au ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Nature Focus - About	Australia en	environment	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
tumcarbon.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	TUM Carbon	en	environment	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
carbonengineering.online ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Carbon Engineering \| Direct Air Capture of CO2 \| Home	en	environment Craft CMS	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
carbonengineering.info ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Carbon Engineering \| Direct Air Capture of CO2 \| Home	en	environment Craft CMS	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
bluecarbonlab.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Home - Blue Carbon Lab	en	environment WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thegreenmp.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Green Mpumalanga \| Nature-Based Carbon Offset Project	en	environment	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
quitcarbonnc.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Quit Carbon	en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
carbonfriendly.earth ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Carbon Friendly	en	environment	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
carbonliteracy.wales ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Cymru - The Carbon Literacy Project	en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
carbonliteracy.cymru ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Cymru - The Carbon Literacy Project	en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bluecarbon.group ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Blue Carbon Group	en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nicolevenker.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	NICOLE T. VENKER - About	en	environment Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pyrocene-alliance.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	- About us	en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pyrocenealliance.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	- About us	en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
blueskies.world ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Scientifically-Backed Carbon Footprint Calculators. - BlueSkies	en	environment	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
carbonpolicynavigator.earth ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Carbon Policy Navigator	en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
carbonliteracy.scot ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Scotland - The Carbon Literacy Project	en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.