similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to broscience.tv

Broscience alternatives & similar sites

BroScience Podcast — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Science →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
simplyscience.ch ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	SimplyScience: Home	Switzerland de	science TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pintofscience.at ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Home \| Pint of Science Austria	Austria de	science SilverStripe	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ladies-in-science.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	LADIES IN SCIENCE - Ladies in Science	de	science TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cs-communication.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Startseite - CS Science Communication GmbH	de	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
neuroscience-music.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Neuroscience with Music \| 11th - 12nd September 2020 - Berlin GERMANY	de	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
service4science.at ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Service4Science – Service 4 Science – We care about Service	Austria de	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
science-center-net.at ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Verein ScienceCenter-Netzwerk \| Wissenschaft &Technik erlebbar machen	Austria de	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sciencecity.at ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Science City Itzling \| Ökosystem für Innovation, Forschung und Bildung Science City Itzling	Austria de	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pccl.at ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	PCCL: Polymer Competence Center Leoben	Austria de	science TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
quase.org ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Quase Quality Assurance in Scientific Evidence – Qualitätssicherung in wissenschaftlichen Erkenntnissen	de	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
scientific.at ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Scientific Medley (Welt der Naturwissenschaften und Politik)	Austria de	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rebernik.at ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	PHAROS International - Bureau for Cultural & Scientific Projects	Austria de	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
scillustration.at ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Tatjana Hirschmugl \| Scientific Illustration – Visualization triggers ideas, amplifies cognition.	Austria de	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
meet-droplets.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	droplets – information for the droplets conferences	de	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
braincity.berlin ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Wissenschaft im Herzen Europas \| Brain City Berlin	de	science TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
caets2026.org ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	CAETS 2026 – Sept 14–17 \| Munich	de	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
carpo-bonn.info ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	CARPO \| home	de	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
angst.science ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Verstand	de	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.