similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to brianshott.com

Brianshott alternatives & similar sites

Brian Shott, PhD – Historian of the nineteenth-century United States — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in History →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
morganng.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	MORGAN NG – Historian of Renaissance Architecture + Visual Culture	en	history WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aliciagutierrezromine.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Alicia Gutierrez-Romine,Ph.D. – Historian and Author	en	history WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
american-historama.org ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	American Historama: United States History for kids ***	en	history	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mcgreene.org ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Maggie Greene \| The Wayward Historian	en	history WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
algerhistory.org ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Alger County Historical Society – Home of the Alger County Historical Society	en	history WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ddaytwins.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	D-Day Twins – The History of the Bowles Twins during WWII	en	history WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	full · 12
24histories.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Records of the Grand Historian - 二十四史	en	history	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ottocentismi.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Ottocentismi – INNCIS – Interdisciplinary Network for Nineteenth-Century Italian Studies	en	history WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
albredenberg.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Al Bredenberg – Author, Researcher, Historian	en	history WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hemmer.co ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Hemmer.co – Historical Consulting	Colombia en	history WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kirkcudbright.co ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	The History, Places and People of the County of Kirkcudbright, Scotland.	Colombia en	history	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
larsbrownworth.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Lars Brownworth - Historian, Author, and Podcaster	en	history	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
1stussscompanyc.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	First United States Sharpshooters, Company C CA	en	history	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
adnanrashid.co.uk ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Adnan Rashid – Historian, Bibliophile, Numismatologist	United Kingdom en	history WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kristyironside.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Kristy Ironside	en	history WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pahistorian.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	PA Historian – Norman Gasbarro, Ed.D.	en	history WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
crusadeforthevote.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	History of U.S. Woman's Suffrage	United States~ en	history Squarespace	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lakewoodhistoricalsociety.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Lakewood Historical Society	en	history	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.