similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to brian16.com

Brian16 alternatives & similar sites

Brian Thornton Architect and Developer — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
brian22.com ↗	80 match 1 shared topics	Brian Thornton Salesforce Architect and Developer	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
brian25.com ↗	80 match 1 shared topics	Brian Thornton Salesforce Architect and Developer	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
brian17.com ↗	80 match 1 shared topics	Brian Thornton Salesforce Architect and Developer	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
brian18.com ↗	80 match 1 shared topics	Brian Thornton Salesforce Architect and Developer	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
brian19.com ↗	80 match 1 shared topics	Brian Thornton Salesforce Architect and Developer	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
brian20.com ↗	80 match 1 shared topics	Brian Thornton Salesforce Architect and Developer	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
brian21.com ↗	80 match 1 shared topics	Brian Thornton Salesforce Architect and Developer	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
0xtedious.dev ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	0xTedious. Backend Developer & Systems Architect	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
1percent.dev ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	1% Developer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
9dev.tech ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	9 Developers	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
9developers.tech ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	9 Developers	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
aaravdayal.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Aarav Dayal \| Blockchain Architect, System Designer & Developer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cassimus.net ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Michael Cassimus – ServiceNow Developer & System Architect	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
predike.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	pred pc – research and development	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
brajk.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Mike Brajkovich - Solutions Architect and Educator	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ianfhood.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Ian F. Hood – Systems Analyst/Architect, Software Developer and Entrepreneur	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
florianschaal.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Florian Schaal \| .NET Developer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nachstedt.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Timo Nachstedt – Developer, Software-Architect, Physicist	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.