similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to brainworks.cc

Brainworks alternatives & similar sites

Brainwork GmbH — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Information And Network Security →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
brainwork.cc ↗	85 match 1 shared topics	Brainwork GmbH	de	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
syret.at ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	syret GmbH	Austria de	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cts-tk.de ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Start - CTS-TK GmbH	Germany de	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cynops.de ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Cynops GmbH	Germany de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
daspro-gmbh.de ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	daspro GmbH	Germany de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
daspro.de ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	daspro GmbH	Germany de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cybercon.swiss ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Cybercon GmbH	de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cybercon.gmbh ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Cybercon GmbH	de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
brainsalimited.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	BRAINSTORM LIMITED	de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
cs-datenwerk.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Datenschutz- & IT-Beratung \| CS Datenwerk GmbH	de	information-and-network-security WordPress WooCommerce	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cs-datenwerk.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Datenschutz- & IT-Beratung \| CS Datenwerk GmbH	Germany de	information-and-network-security WordPress WooCommerce	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bsk-consulting.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	BSK Consulting GmbH	de	information-and-network-security WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
das-checkcenter.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Landing - onysID GmbH	Germany de	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
dora-protect.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Home - Dora Protect GmbH	de	information-and-network-security WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
shu1.at ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Kerkaporta IT Security GmbH	Austria de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cyber-forensics.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Start – HanseSecure GmbH	de	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
daseq.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	DASEQ GmbH - Cybersecurity, Consulting, Training	Germany de	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cste.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Start - ComSec Technologie GmbH	Germany de	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.