similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to bradgarropy.com

Bradgarropy alternatives & similar sites

🏠 my home on the web — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
radscottley.com ↗	79 match 1 shared topics	Home on the web	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rainbow-100.com ↗	77 match 1 shared topics	Jeff's Home on the Web	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
john-oliver.net ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	John Oliver's home on the Web!	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
8bitcloud.com ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	Bruce on the web	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
csvw.org ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	CSVW - CSV on the Web	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jcfiala.net ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	John Fiala's Website \| John Fiala's Home on the Web	en	technology-and-computing Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pwatson.org ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Peter Watson's Home on the Web \| My ramblings on t'Interweb	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
turdserver.net ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Sign In - The smelliest site on the web!	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
blzs.io ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	My Homelab	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bestsysinthe.world ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	KInsta, home of the best SysOps in the world	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
abbadon.tech ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Abbadon: The home of Apollyon	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aceitw.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Ace in the World	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thejadav.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Home - The Jadav	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
robfrye.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Welcome to the website of Rob Frye	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thekeeper.io ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Home \| The Keeper	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
themodems.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Home - The Modems	en	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
quotebacks.net ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Quotebacks - Quote the web	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
qrqy.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Home - The Tinkery	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.