similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to boundex.dev

Boundex alternatives & similar sites

Boundex | The Runtime Execution Boundary for AI Agents — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Information And Network Security →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
tensorpath.ai ↗	74 match 2 shared topics	TensorPath \| Secure Runtime for AI Agents	en	artificial-intelligence	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
apir.ai ↗	71 match 2 shared topics	APIR - The Verification Layer for AI Agents	Australia~ en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
nileshchakraborty.com ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	Talos Protocol \| The Trust Layer for AI Agents	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
odralabs.com ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	Polis - Secure Workspace for AI Agents	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
mvar.io ↗	69 match 2 shared topics	MVAR – Deterministic Security for AI Agents	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
evotac.com ↗	69 match 2 shared topics	EVOTAC — AI Agents for the Tactical Edge	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
everharden.com ↗	69 match 2 shared topics	EverHarden — the deterministic action gate for AI agents	Germany~ en	artificial-intelligence Spree Commerce	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
megent.dev ↗	69 match 2 shared topics	Firewall for AI agents.	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
oculisecurity.com ↗	69 match 2 shared topics	Oculi — Oversight and policy for AI agents in production	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
saidprotocol.com ↗	69 match 2 shared topics	SAID Protocol - Identity Infrastructure for AI Agents	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
livic.ai ↗	69 match 2 shared topics	Livic AI – Autonomous Trust & Security Layer for AI Agents	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
4tress.org ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	4tress.org — Decentralized Identity for AI Agents	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aptivoraai.com ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	SentinelMCP — Zero-Trust Security for AI Agents	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
entropy0.ai ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Entropy0 — Source Trust for AI Agents	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
withzelys.com ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Zelys — Auditable guardrails for agent runtimes	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mvs.dev ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Jit \| AI Agents That Execute Product Security	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
safuclaw.com ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Safuclaw — Security Audit Skill for AI Agents	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
orite.tech ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Orite — Identity & Trust Infrastructure for AI Agents	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.