similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to borovicka.org

Borovicka alternatives & similar sites

Jaroslav Borovička >> Homepage at New York University — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Economy →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
giuseppedaneseecon.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Giuseppe Danese, Ph.D. \| University of Padua	en	economy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gideonmoore.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Gideon Moore \| Economics PhD Student at Stanford University	en	economy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
stefanbehringer.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Stefan Behringer's Homepage	en	economy Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
miristryjan.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Miri Stryjan \| Economics \| Aalto University	en	economy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
myriammarending.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	My homepage	en	economy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
a-leroux.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Anke Leroux - Monash University	en	economy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
debdwyeranalytics.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Economist \| Deb Dwyer Analytics \| New York	en	economy Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
tgallen.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Gallen - Homepage	en	economy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kevindevereux.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Kevin Devereux – Department of Economics at the Chinese University of Hong Kong	en	economy WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
emilyclawler.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Emily C. Lawler \| Associate Professor \| University of Georgia	en	economy WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kevinremmy.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Kevin Remmy \| Homepage	en	economy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
myrenegarcia.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	rené garcia \| Université de Montréal	en	economy WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
benjamin-enke.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Benjamin Enke \| Homepage	en	economy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
benzissimos.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Ben Zissimos - University of Exeter Business School	en	economy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
teodoraboneva.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Teodora Boneva \| Professor of Economics at the University of Bonn	en	economy WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gianmarcodaniele.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	GIANMARCO DANIELE - Home	en	economy Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aden.africa ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Homepage - Africa & Diaspora Economic Network (ADEN)	en	economy WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
global-dem.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Homepage - Global Demographics	en	economy WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.