similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to border-crossing.ch

Border Crossing alternatives & similar sites

Kommunikationsagentur Border Crossing AG Bern — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Communication →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
jens-heinrich.de ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Jens Heinrich - Kommunikationsarchitektur	Germany de	communication WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lolaber.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	LOLABER Avatar Kommunikation	de	communication WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jp-kommunikationsprojekte.de ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Jeanette Pollach - Kommunikationsprojekte	Germany de	communication WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
humangames.net ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Arven Kommunikation	de	communication	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
juliathurau.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Projektmanagement und Kommunikation - Julia Thurau	Germany de	communication WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
voice-of-events.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	PANNES.kommunikation - Home	de	communication	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
1shout.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	1SHOUT - Professionelle Krisenkommunikation	Germany de	communication WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
2dc.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	2dc gruppe - die Architekten der Kommunikation	Germany de	communication	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cemince.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Internationale Kommunikation & Übersetzungslösungen	de	communication Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
csarrey-franzoesisch.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Qualität in Kommunikation: Übersetzungen & Lektorat	de	communication Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
barrierefreie-kommunikation.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Barrierefreie Kommunikation - Wichtiges Ziel bei jedem Projekt!	de	communication WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gerz.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Gerz Communication	de	communication	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
janaschuette.de ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	JANA SCHÜTTE / HANDGEMACHTE KOMMUNIKATION	Germany de	communication	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ado-gramm.de ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	ADO-GRAMM – Kommunikation & Information	Germany de	communication WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aakii.de ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	AAKii: Arbeitsgemeinschaft - Akustik - Kommunikation - interdisziplinär - international	Germany de	communication	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
psieben.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	P7 Digitale Kommunikation – P7 Digitale Kommunikation	de	communication WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
iuk-hamm.de ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	iuk-hamm.de – Wir kümmern uns um die Kommunikation	Germany de	communication WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
julianetopka.de ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Juliane Topka \| Lektorat für Unternehmenskommunikation	Germany de	communication WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.