similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to boilercode.live

Boilercode alternatives & similar sites

CodeBoiler - API Code Generator — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Programming Languages →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
ngocoder.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Ngocoder - Code For Fun	en	programming-languages WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gyassa.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Gyassa \| General code and thoughts from an owner of Gyassa	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
quickcoder.org ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Quickcoder - Free code tutorials and tech guides!	en	technology-and-computing WordPress Gumroad	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
blueinfinitycodeworld.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Blue Infinity Code World	en	technology-and-computing Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rockcancode.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Rock Can Code	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
avdi.codes ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	avdi.codes – Avdi Grimm, Code Cleric	en	technology-and-computing WordPress Lightspeed	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jathan.dev ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Where The Wild Code Is	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
quickpaste.net ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	quickpaste - dead simple code sharing	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
newyorkcodeandcoffee.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	NY Code & Coffee	en	technology-and-computing Spree Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
velvetcache.org ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	John Hobbs on coding, Omaha, and life in general	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bloclawd.org ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	bloclawd — Got rate-limited by Claude Code or Codex?	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 5
robertoor.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Roberto OR – Code and Life	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
blink.engineer ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Blink API Documentation	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
apg.codes ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	APG Codes	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pxlabs.info ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	PXLabs - Adventures in PowerShell Alchemy: Turning Code into Solutions	en	programming-languages WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cultureascodemanifesto.org ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Culture as Code Manifesto – #cacman	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
acecoderzz.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Home - Acecoderzz	en	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
javacoder.org ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Home - Java Coder \| Enterprise Java & JVM Engineering	en	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.