similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to bohnertchris.com

Bohnertchris alternatives & similar sites

bohnertchris (Chris Bohnert) · GitHub — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
jasonharbert.com ↗	77 match 1 shared topics	jharbert (Jason Harbert) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
blattgold.studio ↗	76 match 1 shared topics	erfurtjohn (John) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mechanized.net ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	BrianFrisch · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jefta.net ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	JeftaDirksen (Jef) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jasondscott.com ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	jasondscott (Jason Scott) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
labudis.com ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	labudis (Tadas Labudis) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
robertsenseman.com ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	rsenseman (Rob) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jeffkarpala.dev ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	jkarpala (Jeff Karpala) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jasonbarratt.com ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	Jason-Barratt (Jason) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jeffmallozzi.dev ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	jeffmallozzi (Jeff M) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bradvarnum.com ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	bradv123 (Brad Varnum) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
antalaron.codes ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	antalaron (Antal Áron) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ayatv.online ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	aghmourdev1 (AGHMOURDEV) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
jessekeane.me ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	jarofghosts (jesse keane) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jasonnyberg.com ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	jasonnyberg (Jason Nyberg) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
robertpaul.io ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	robertwpaul (Robert Paul) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
andow.fun ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	ende23r (Eric) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jbchouinard.net ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	jbchouinard (JB Chouinard) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.