similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to blizzz.de

Blizzz alternatives & similar sites

Arthur acquaints | Tidings of the Penguins from the Clouds — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Cloud Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
nerdmania.de ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Matthias Holzer · Cloud Architect & Technical Leader	Germany de	cloud-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pgeisler.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Patrick’s Tech Blog – My Cloud Computing focused blog	de	cloud-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nenoloje.de ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Neno Loje - Ihr Berater für Team Foundation Server, Scrum and DevOps	Germany de	cloud-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ng-c.de ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	André Lorenzen	Germany de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nikolaus-bruck.de ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Nikolaus Bruck	Germany de	cloud-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
niedhorn.de ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Rolf Niedhorn \| persönlicher Technologie-Blog \| M365 Modern Workplace – Microsoft 365 – M365 Adoption – Microsoft Intune	Germany de	cloud-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
tuxig.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Gemeinsam die Technik auf morgen vorbereiten · Welcome	de	cloud-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
microlytix.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	M i c r o l y t i x	de	cloud-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
computerwelt.at ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Computerwoche – Ihr Wegweiser für die digitale Transformation	Austria de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
obi-lab.at ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Michael Obernberger‘s Blog	Austria de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
norocketscience.at ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	No Rocket Science	Austria de	cloud-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 2
maxriegler.at ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Home \| Max Riegler	Austria de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
techguy.at ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	TechGuy - Service Management, Automation, PowerShell, Azure Automation, Logic Apps, and more	Austria de	cloud-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
testejetzt.at ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	fraubaum.at – Tech & Craft Beer	Austria de	cloud-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
365techupdates.com ↗	40 match 2 shared topics	Microsoft 365 Hub	de	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
appspark.at ↗	40 match 2 shared topics	AppSpark - Progressive Software Engineering	Austria de	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
der-alex.at ↗	40 match 2 shared topics	der-alex.at - verspielt und technikbegeistert	Austria de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
switchsource.at ↗	40 match 2 shared topics	Home - twopeaks.digital	Austria de	cloud-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.