similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to blend.technology

Blend alternatives & similar sites

Blend Technology — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Design →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
a-ll.tech ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	A-LL Creative Technology	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	partial · 8
deitysoft.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Deitysoft Technology — Digital Studio	en	design	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aino.agency ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Aino — Design & Technology Agency	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aino.cash ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Aino — Design & Technology Agency	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mindsausage.tech ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Adiron Technologies LLC	en	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mjhartdesign.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	mjhartdesign – architect and technology-enthusiast	en	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
airwavestechnology.website ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Airwaves Technology Web alpha	en	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
giantbot.app ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Giant Bot — Creative Technology Agency	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
giantbot.dev ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Giant Bot — Creative Technology Agency	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gigadesignstudio.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Giga — Towards a new synthesis of design and technology	en	design	robots llmsaihumans	email phone	none
addit.studio ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	ADDIT Studio - Breaking the boundaries of architecture, design and technology	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
adg.technology ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Allensworth Design Group – Design and Technology Consulting	en	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
allensworthdg.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Allensworth Design Group – Design and Technology Consulting	en	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
meaningful.studio ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Meaningful \| Technology. Creation. Industry.	en	design Prismic	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
delineatormedia.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Delineator - Design for consequential technology	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
stijnds.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Stijn de Schryver — Creative Technologist	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
stijndeschryver.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Stijn de Schryver — Creative Technologist	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
14islands.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	14islands \| Creative design & technology agency	en	design Sanity	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.