similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to blakechapmancomms.com

Blakechapmancomms alternatives & similar sites

Science Communication & Grant Writing Support - Blake Chapman — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Science →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
coriolismagazine.com ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	Coriolis Magazine – Writings on Science Communication	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
3mbed.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	3MBED – Science Communication & Design for Biotech and Research	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
medianeuroscience.org ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Media Neuroscience Lab \| Research and Teaching at the Intersection of Communication, Technology, and Neuroscience	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
backyourscience.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	backYourScience: The Indian Science Commune	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thevedscience.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	The Ved Science Publication	en	science Shopify	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ooidscientific.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Ooid Scientific — Research Consulting & Science Communication, WA – Independent research consulting and science communication for researchers, government and industry — based in WA, working nationally and internationally	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
britishscienceassociation.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	British Science Association	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
3ratsinalabcoat.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	THREE RATS IN A LAB COAT – Come for the science writing, stay for the silly graphs.	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lariso.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Los Altos Science Olympiad Invitational	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
indianscientificco.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Indian Scientific Co. \| Education & Lab Equipment Since 1994.	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robots llmsaihumans	email phone	none
crystallinewritingllc.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Crystalline Writing, LLC – Clear. Beautiful. Science	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
corrsin.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Corrsin \| Operational Memory for Science	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
2dayesscience.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	2 DayesScience \| Hillsborough, NC	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cost.eu ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	COST \| European Cooperation in Science and Technology	European Union en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mdsci.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Home \| Maryland Science Center	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
fervae.app ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Fervae \| Talk Your Science	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
100topscience.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	100 Top Science Sites	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
100topsciencesites.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	100 Top Science Sites	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.