similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to blachere.at

Blachere alternatives & similar sites

Blachere Illumination | Stadtillumination und Dekoration — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Design →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
evelynlisi.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Textildesign und Illustration	de	design Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aproposdesign.de ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Kommunikations-Design - à propos kommunikation und design	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
delphine-illustration.de ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Illustration und Grafikdesign - Delphine Illustration	Germany de	design Joomla	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
doc-office.de ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Dokumentation und Präsentation - document office	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
denisgombert.de ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Design und technische Illustration Portfolio - Designer und technischer Illustrator Denis Gombert	Germany de	design Jimdo	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
anke-goodwin.de ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Anke Goodwin, freiberufliche Designerin \| Design und Illustration	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
proclamation.ch ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Proclamation \| Eveline Arnold \| Konzept + Design - Proclamation	Switzerland de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
annikakuhn.de ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Home - Annika Kuhn \| Illustration und Grafik aus einer Hand, Aachen	Germany de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
archidot.de ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Archidot – Redaktion und Gestaltung	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
artedge.de ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	artedge – design + illustration	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
andreajaschinski.de ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Andrea Jaschinski – Stadtentwicklerin und Designerin	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
crosscreation.de ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	crosscreation – Mediendesign und Fotografie	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cross-creation.de ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	crosscreation – Mediendesign und Fotografie	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
designzig.de ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	designzig – Grafikbüro, Illustrationen und mehr	Germany de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
anjatittel.de ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Anja Tittel – Maßgeschneiderte Designs und Illustrationen	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
herrspecht.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Herr Specht / Gestaltung und Illustration aus Berlin	de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kramarek.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	kramarek designagentur \| strategie \| gestaltung \| kommunikation	de	design	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
vividshapes.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Vollmar & Vision \| Studio für Gestaltung	de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.