similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to birkner.one

Birkner alternatives & similar sites

Ben Birkner – Das bin ich. — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
notmypeak.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	OPR Tech – Device Tracker	de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
s4-archiv.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	S4 World – The world of S4	Germany de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kpg7.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	KPG \| KPG – Deutung & Hinweise	Germany de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
robinmatz.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Robin Matz – Fullstack Engineer	Germany de	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rolandpoellinger.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Roland Poellinger – Library \| Philosophy \| Digital	Germany de	technology-and-computing Webflow	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
saccom.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	SACCOM – COMPUTER NEWS UND MEHR …	Germany de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
roguelegends.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Simon Lange – Senior IT Allrounder – Bürgerrechtler – Vater	Germany de	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alkanakarsu.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	A. Alkan Akarsu – Wilkommen zu meiner Seite.	de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mebeim.net ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Marco Bonelli – @mebeim	de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sammlung-mante.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Harald Mante – Wikipedia	Germany de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sammlungmante.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Harald Mante – Wikipedia	Germany de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mcmaier.net ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	mcmaier.net – Martin Maier	Germany~ de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
meinleben.digital ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Startseite – BASIC thinking	de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
robert-wodara.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Robert Wodara – Portfolio	Germany de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
robkey.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	robkey.de – Projekte & Tools	Germany de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kerstinblodig.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Der Blog rund um das Thema Technik & mehr \| technikkiste.de	Germany de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
alridare.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Alridare – Ritter der Neuzeit	de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
minuy.info ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Anmelden ‹ M in UY – WordPress	de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.