similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to bgrdc.com

Bgrdc alternatives & similar sites

BGR Group | Expert Policy Advocacy and Public Relations — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Politics →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
budgetandpolicy.org ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Washington State Budget and Policy Center	en	politics WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
erikrandolphconsulting.com ↗	48 match 2 shared topics	Home - Finding the Best Public Policy Solutions	en	politics WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
naco.org ↗	43 match 2 shared topics	National Association of Counties	en	politics Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sistakstrategies.com ↗	41 match 2 shared topics	Sistak Strategies, Inc. « Political Action – Government Affairs	en	politics WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bransonmo.gov ↗	40 match 2 shared topics	Branson, MO - Official Website \| Official Website	en	civic-affairs	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
neildreilly.com ↗	38 match 1 shared topics	Neil Douglas Reilly – Public Affairs and Policy Executive	en	politics WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
publicgoodblog.com ↗	37 match 1 shared topics	Public Good – commentary on politics and policy	en	politics WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dotzaueradvisory.com ↗	36 match 1 shared topics	Dotzauer Advisory Group \| Political Strategy & Advisory	en	politics	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alliance-exchange.org ↗	36 match 1 shared topics	Alliance for International Exchange \| The Collective Public Policy Voice of the Exchange Community	United States~ en	politics Squarespace Magento	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
publicpoweredpolicy.com ↗	36 match 1 shared topics	Your voice matters. \| Public Powered Policy	en	politics	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
psephia.com ↗	36 match 1 shared topics	Psephia - Public Opinion Polls, Voting and Debate	en	politics	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
americanprinciplesproject.org ↗	35 match 1 shared topics	American Principles Project — Putting Families First in Public Policy	en	politics WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
psiquepol.ai ↗	35 match 1 shared topics	Psiquepol + AI — The political intelligence suite for public affairs	en	politics	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
publicpolicybuilder.com ↗	35 match 1 shared topics	Public Policy Builder – Research for Smart Public Policy	en	politics WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
horseshoecrabsex.org ↗	35 match 1 shared topics	The Heritage Foundation	en	politics Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
myheritage.org ↗	35 match 1 shared topics	The Heritage Foundation	en	politics Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
publicaffairspartners.com ↗	35 match 1 shared topics	Home \| Public Affairs Partners	en	politics Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
publicsquarepost.com ↗	35 match 1 shared topics	Home \| Public Square Post	en	politics	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 1

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.