similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to benjaminpbreen.com

Benjaminpbreen alternatives & similar sites

Benjamin Breen — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Science →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
catapultdotblog.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	The Writings of R. Anthony Saritelli– Riverside, Rhode Island USA – Interesting topics explored to provide insight & answers to enigmatic problems in science & history. My ideas augment the factual research of those who are in the know and my references deserve their full credit for thei	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
deeptimeisamyth.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Deep Time is a Myth	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
brookepenalozapatzak.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Brooke Penaloza-Patzak	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	full · 18
icarehb.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	ICArEHB	en	science WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
brkanter.com ↗	40 match 1 shared topics	Benjamin Richard Kanter	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
brewsterfisherieslab.com ↗	34 match 1 shared topics	Home - Brewster Fisheries Lab	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
simonlohse.com ↗	34 match 1 shared topics	Simon Lohse	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lcrossey.com ↗	34 match 1 shared topics	Laura J. Crossey – Distinguished Professor, Earth & Planetary Sciences, University of New Mexico	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
treyboone.com ↗	34 match 1 shared topics	Trey Boone – Assistant Professor \| Department of Philosophy \| University of Virginia	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
simon-brain.com ↗	34 match 1 shared topics	Simon Brain	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
breguerandkrugger.com ↗	34 match 1 shared topics	Home - breguerandkrugger.com	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
footprintsintime.ca ↗	33 match 1 shared topics	Footprints in Time - Tracking dinosaurs in British Columbia	Canada en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
carolynbrinkworth.com ↗	33 match 1 shared topics	Carolyn Brinkworth - Home	en	science Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aaps-journal.org ↗	33 match 1 shared topics	The Journal of Paleontological Sciences	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
tribology-services.com ↗	33 match 1 shared topics	Start - Tribologie Mannheim	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
altitudesciencesinc.com ↗	33 match 1 shared topics	Next Gen Altitude Sciences Inc. - Innovators in Scientific Research	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
fondvyzov.com ↗	33 match 1 shared topics	VYZOV — Foundation for Scientific and Cultural Links	en	science Bitrix	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
precisionresearchco.com ↗	33 match 1 shared topics	Unified Precision Insights \| Leading the Future of Precision and Innovation	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.