similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔎Similar Site SearchFind websites like any domain 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to benambalong.com

Benambalong alternatives & similar sites

Ben Ambalong User Experience and Design — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Design →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
renujohnson.com ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	Renu Johnson - User Experience and Interaction Designer	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
benlevin.com ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	Ben Levin, Experience Strategy and Design	en	design Gumroad	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kenguzik.com ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	Ken Guzik - User Experience Designer	en	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	full · 20
willslatondesign.com ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	Will Slaton Design \| User Experience	en	design Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
emptydesign.com ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	Monica Tan - User Experience Designer	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aaronsimkin.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Mental Models ® – User Experience Design	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bemuzamil.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Malik Muzamil User Experience Designer in London	en	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
delameanadesign.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Delameana Design – Design and User Experience Leader	en	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nareshuxd.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Naresh Byreddy — Senior User Experience Designer	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
teneostudios.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	teneo \| in-depth research, industrial design and user experience	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bensonvisuals.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	User Experience \| Benson Visuals Design \| Seattle	en	design Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alinear.net ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	alinear _ experience design and identity.	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
giannaliaoux.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Gianna Liao \| user experience	en	design Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
metaverso.soy ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Jose Escrig \| Experience Designer	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
giusepperussodesign.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Giuseppe Russo \| Industrial Design \| User Experience	en	design Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bencoar.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Ben Coar Design	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
macchione.design ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Mike Macchione - Experience Designer	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gardenpost.org ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Julie Casanave — User Experience Designer & Design Manager	en	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.