similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to bemepro.ch

Bemepro alternatives & similar sites

bemepro – Ökonomische Forschung und Beratung — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Economy →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
culturaleconomics.de ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Cultural Economics – Literatur- und kulturwissenschaftliche Wirtschaftsforschung	Germany de	economy WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
allinger.biz ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	INWISO - Institut für empirische Wirtschafts- und Sozialforschung - Home	de	economy Joomla	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
anke-dembowski.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Unternehmensberatung Anke Dembowski	Germany de	economy Joomla	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
overcommoning.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Friederike Habermann - Ökonomin & Historikerin - overcommoning	de	economy Jimdo	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ctce.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	CTCE – Wachstum durch deutsch-chinesische Wirtschaftsbeziehungen	Germany de	economy WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sky4me.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Deutsche Staatsschulden 2026 – Echtzeit-Tracker	de	economy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alexandernitsch.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	alexandernitsch – economic think tank	de	economy WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
berlin-economics.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Startseite - Berlin Economics	de	economy WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
misthos.org ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Misthos Org – Demokratisches Eigentum für deine Wirtschaft	de	economy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
angelikabudjan.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Angelika Budjan \| Applied Economist \| Development, Environment & Urbanization	Germany de	economy WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
volkercarus.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	FX-Märkte und Geopolitik	de	economy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ammersee-tourismus.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	StarnbergAmmersee.de – Informationen zu Wirtschaft, Tourismus und die Region StarnbergAmmersee	Germany de	economy TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
danielstaehr.de ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Daniel R. Stähr – Portfolio	Germany de	economy WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
eu-economic-summit.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Europäischer Wirtschaftssenat: Home	de	economy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
anastasiadanilov.de ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Anastasia Danilov – Assistant Professor of Organizational Economics and Future of Work at the Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Einstein Center Digital Future	Germany de	economy WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
land-use-policy.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Dirk.Loehr \| About a sustainable economic order	de	economy WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
crystal-ventura.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Crystal Ventura – Weltwirtschaft verstehen, Chancen erkennen	de	economy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dickscheid.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Ralf Dickscheid	de	economy WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.