similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to baumanndesign.de

Baumanndesign alternatives & similar sites

OneUp - Design and Creative Direction - Ivonne Elsässer — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Design →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
nikolamartini.de ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Nikola Martini – Design & Creative Direction	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
vectorlounge.de ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Vector Lounge: Digital Design Inspiration and Creative Tutorials	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
vectorcraft.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	VectorCraft: Creative Digital Design & Illustration Blog	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
katrinized.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	katrinized.com – Creative Design	de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
twaschke.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Home - Thomas Waschke / Art / Creative / Direction	de	design Contao	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mikejohnotto.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Mike John Otto. Executive Creative Director & Artist.	Germany~ de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
elealackner.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Elea Lackner – art direction & graphic design	de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
andrealacher.ch ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Andrea Lacher \| Grafik Design & Art Direction \| Zürich	Switzerland de	design Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
norbertandrup.de ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	NORBERT ANDRUP + CREATIVDIRECTOR + GRAPHIKDESIGN + ILLUSTRATION + FRANKFURT	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
buerobecker.ch ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Büro Becker – Identity \| Brand Design \| Art Direction	Switzerland de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nikopelz.de ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	nikopelz \| freelance digital creative & UI/UX designer	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
opki.de ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Orson Podgorski – Art Direction & Experience Design	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ttproducts-hofmann.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	TTProducts - Design \| Marke \| Innovation - Home	de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
akhof-designandprint.ch ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	AKHOF-DesignAndPrint \| creative visual communication	Switzerland de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
andreaskonrad.ch ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	andreas konrad \| Art Direction und Multimedia-Design	Switzerland de	design Squarespace Magento	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
katipaech.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	art direction & konzeption	de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ninawilsmann.de ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Nina Simone Wilsmann – Art Direction · Corporate Design · Illustration	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
diedasweb.at ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Willkommen - design akademie salzburg	Austria de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.