similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to badjs.org

Badjs alternatives & similar sites

Carson Fleming | Software Engineer — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
cwjensendesign.com ↗	73 match 2 shared topics	Chris Jensen - DevSecOps Software Engineer, HIPAA Security	en	information-and-network-security Ghost	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
eugeniabahit.co.uk ↗	73 match 2 shared topics	Eugenia Bahit — Core Library Architect and Software Engineer	United Kingdom en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dackjempsey.com ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	Quantum Dempsey – Discussing software, engineering, cybersecurity, and quantum	en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
carsonfleming.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Carson Fleming \| Software Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cflems.net ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Carson Fleming \| Software Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cflems.io ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Carson Fleming \| Software Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cfleming.org ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Carson Fleming \| Software Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kallanfraser.com ↗	69 match 2 shared topics	Kallan Fraser \| Backend & Security Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
cedricmiller.dev ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Cedric Miller \| DevSecOps & Security Engineer	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
0-x.dev ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	0xDev - Security Engineering & Development	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
igotroot.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	iGotRoot - Security Engineer & Researcher	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mdminhazulhaque.io ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Md. Minhazul Haque \| Platform Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mell0wx.tech ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	mell0wx — Cybersecurity Engineer Portfolio	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
zrouga.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Mohamed Zrouga — Platform Engineer & Python/Go Developer \| London, UK	United Kingdom~ en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
project-ra.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Projectra \| Enterprise Software, QA & Cybersecurity Partner	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
briacd.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Developer Portfolio, Security Research and Engineering Blog \| Briac	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
britikovki.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Informal engineering	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
daybreaksec.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Daybreak \| Fractional security engineer for emerging tech	en	information-and-network-security	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.