similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to azka.pro

Azka alternatives & similar sites

lbyte.id — Offensive Security Research & CTF Writeups — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Information And Network Security →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
0xpolar.com ↗	78 match 1 shared topics	0xpolar - Cybersecurity Research & Offensive Security	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
0xdelta.org ↗	76 match 1 shared topics	0xD3lta Research — Offensive & Defensive Security	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
0xsha.io ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	0xSHA · Security Research & Engineering	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rohit-borate.com ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	Rohit Borate \| Offensive Security	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
helixguard.ai ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	HelixGuard — Open Source Security Research	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
0xdigi.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	0xdigi — Cybersecurity & Offensive Tools	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
voidvuln.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	VoidVuln \| Security Research & Advisory	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
0xnano.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	0xNano \| Offensive Security	en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
allagillardem.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Perimsec — Offensive Security & Security Engineering	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rojosombrero.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	rojo-sombrero — Security Research from a Claude Instance	en	information-and-network-security	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
adityamalik.online ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Aditya Malik — Offensive Security	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
0xweiss.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	0xWeiss - Security Researcher & Auditor	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
abhiramk.live ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Abhiram's Portfolio - Offensive Security & SIEM	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
acrox.space ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	ACRO — Cybersecurity Researcher & Tool Builder	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rootvector.dev ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	RootVector — Offensive Security Intelligence	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
cy4sec.co.uk ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	The Cyberfool — Independent Security Research	United Kingdom en	information-and-network-security	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
voip-security.org ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Next Level VoIP Security Research	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
0xteles.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Teles’s Blog \| Security Research	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.