similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to azamat.work

Azamat alternatives & similar sites

Azamat Shirinshoev's Portfolio — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Information And Network Security →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
kyakei.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	kyakei \| Portfolio	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
ttargiel.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Tomasz Targiel • Portfolio	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
0xcmv.net ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	0xCMV \| Chris's Portfolio	en	information-and-network-security WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
andrei.quest ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	C4sh3r \| Portfolio Terminal	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cybericeman.info ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Cyber ICEMAN - Cybersecurity Portfolio	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
jeremybrownportfolio.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Portfolio	en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
crystallitaker.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Crystal Litaker \| Cyber Portfolio	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
r0shhh.dev ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Security Portfolio \| Detection Engineering & SOC Operations	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
0xprasanna.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Prasanna \| Application Security Portfolio	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
0xkayala.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Satya Prakash \| InfoSec Portfolio	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
0xbryan.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Bryan Guevara \| Cybersecurity Portfolio	en	information-and-network-security	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
tschoell.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Portfolio \| Juri Tschoell	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
qttn.net ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Ismail Qattan – Cybersecurity Portfolio	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rodgviola.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Rodg Viola - Portfolio	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
azizk.design ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Aziz Khilawala's Product Design Portfolio	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
crystalbrock.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Crystal Brock Portfolio	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jessanm.tech ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Jessan Mojica Portfolio	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
0xlolbullen.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Victor Åhgren \| Cybersecurity Blog & Portfolio	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.