similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to axelys.ca

Axelys alternatives & similar sites

Axelys | Conjuguer science et société : Axelys — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Science →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
boiteascience.com ↗	36 match 1 shared topics	Boite à science	fr	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
deux-point-zero.com ↗	36 match 1 shared topics	DEUX POINT ZERO – Sciences, techniques et technologies: quand la philosophie questionne l'innovation	fr	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cerist.dz ↗	35 match 1 shared topics	CERIST (Centre de Recherche sur l'Information Scientifique et Technique ) - CERIST	fr	science Joomla	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
liegesciencepark.be ↗	35 match 1 shared topics	LIEGE science park	Belgium fr	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
liegesciencespark.be ↗	35 match 1 shared topics	LIEGE science park	Belgium fr	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
usm-ge.ch ↗	34 match 1 shared topics	Home - Unité scientifique mobile	Switzerland fr	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dieulasciencelespreuves.com ↗	34 match 1 shared topics	Accueil - Dieu, la science, les preuves	fr	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
afis.org ↗	34 match 1 shared topics	Afis Science - Association française pour l information scientifique	fr	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
savoirchoc.com ↗	34 match 1 shared topics	Savoir Choc — Science, Histoire et Mystères en vidéos courtes	fr	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
scanlitt.com ↗	34 match 1 shared topics	Explorez et synthétisez la littérature scientifique à la vitesse de la lumière	fr	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
educascience.net ↗	33 match 1 shared topics	Pour les éducateurs - Sciences jeunesse Canada \| Sciences jeunesse Canada	fr	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
2masga.com ↗	33 match 1 shared topics	2MASGA - Accueil	fr	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jamesalzetta.com ↗	33 match 1 shared topics	James Alzetta – Intervenant scientifique en sciences sociales	fr	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
centre-mersenne.org ↗	33 match 1 shared topics	centre Mersenne : revues scientifiques en libre accès	fr	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lascience.be ↗	32 match 1 shared topics	LaScience.be - Une introduction aux sciences et plus particulièrement aux sciences humaines	Belgium fr	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jaipige.com ↗	32 match 1 shared topics	J'ai PiGé — Révolutionner l'apprentissage des sciences.	fr	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
lascientotheque.be ↗	32 match 1 shared topics	Accueil - La Scientothèque	Belgium fr	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lespetitsdebrouillards.be ↗	32 match 1 shared topics	Les Petits Débrouillards asbl - Drôlement scientifique avec les Petits Débrouillards	Belgium fr	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.