similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to awanic.fi

Awanic alternatives & similar sites

Awanic Oy – Awanic Oy — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Software And Applications →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
aaconsulting.fi ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Lentokenttäohjelmistot \| A&A Consulting Oy – Lahti Finland	Finland fi	software-and-applications WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alessa.cloud ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Alessa – Kilpailuetua tiedolla johtamisen ja analytiikan avulla	fi	software-and-applications WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
alessa.fi ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Alessa – Kilpailuetua tiedolla johtamisen ja analytiikan avulla	Finland fi	software-and-applications WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
vitec-raisoft.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Vitec Raisoft – interRAI‑ratkaisut ja RAIsoft.net‑ohjelmisto	fi	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
vitec-katrina.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Katrina – seurakuntien toiminnanohjausjärjestelmä arjen tueksi	fi	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
abako.fi ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Abako - Abako	Finland fi	software-and-applications	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mitrox.io ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Mitrox – Software house, joka rakentaa kunnianhimoisia tuotteita	fi	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
arek.fi ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Arek - Luotetuin kumppani työeläkealan yhteisissä IT-palveluissa.	Finland fi	software-and-applications WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
paja.io ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Paja.io – Käytännönläheinen ohjelmistopaja	fi	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ajas.fi ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Kanta-yhteensopiva ajanvaraus- ja asiakashallintajärjestelmä \| Ajas	Finland fi	software-and-applications WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	email phone	none
vitec-futursoft.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Vitec Futursoft	fi	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
vitecfutursoft.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Vitec Futursoft	fi	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aplika.fi ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Aplika Oy	Finland fi	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
abilita.fi ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Abilita \| Julkishallinnon järjestelmätoimittaja	Finland fi	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	partial · 2
aneo.fi ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Aneo Software Oy \| Selkeä ja Huoleton Kunnossapitojärjestelmä	Finland fi	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
anders.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Anders - Kokenut ohjelmistokehityksen luottokumppani	fi	software-and-applications WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	email phone	none
aboniitti.fi ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Aboniitti Oy - Software Solutions	Finland fi	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aiso.fi ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Aiso — Ohjelmistokonsultointi Tampere \| Ohjelmistokehitys & arkkitehtuuri	Finland fi	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.