Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfilePricingAI ReportBrowse free →

Sites similar to avec.no

Avec alternatives & similar sites

AVEC – Verdiskapende og bærekraftige omgivelser — 9 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Green Solutions →

DomainMatchTitleCountry/LangCategoryAI filesContactAI-protection
ressursogmiljo.com 62 match
2 shared topics
Bergen-active no green-solutions robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
fjelltg.com 61 match
2 shared topics
Your partner for making value out of rest raw materials! - FTG no environmental-services-industry robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
miljotransport.com 31 match
1 shared topics
Vi tar vare på fremtiden | Franzefoss | Franzefoss no environmental-services-industryHubSpot robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
miljotransport.org 31 match
1 shared topics
Vi tar vare på fremtiden | Franzefoss | Franzefoss no environmental-services-industryHubSpot robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
kildesortering.com 31 match
1 shared topics
ECO-NOR AS - Løsninger for avfallshåndtering no environmental-services-industry robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
banyulebinhire.com.au 30 match
1 shared topics
Banyule Bin Hire Australia no environmental-services-industryWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
afkvannkraft.com 23 match
1 shared topics
AFK Vannkraft no power-and-energy-industrySanity robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
abakus.as 20 match
1 shared topics
Hjem - Abakus no green-solutions robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
sirk.app 20 match
1 shared topics
Sirktek no green-solutions robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.