similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to avatar-dc.de

Avatar Dc alternatives & similar sites

Avatar – DC — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
nmx.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	NMX.DE – Why not.	Germany de	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
inator.at ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	inator.at – inator	Austria de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
tunnelsurveyor.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Tunnelsurveyor – Scan and Set-out	de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mebeim.net ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Marco Bonelli – @mebeim	de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
horst-scheuer.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Horst Scheuer – Technik, Internet & mehr	de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
horst-scheuer.net ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Horst Scheuer – Technik, Internet & mehr	de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mcmaier.net ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	mcmaier.net – Martin Maier	Germany~ de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
meinleben.digital ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Startseite – BASIC thinking	de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
un-hack-bar.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	UN-Hack-Bar – Hackspace, Treffpunkt & Werkstatt für kreatives	Germany de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
basicthinking.at ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Startseite – BASIC thinking	Austria de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
servicenotnow.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Closing Projects – IT-Native	de	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
devbase.at ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	devbase.at – by Thomas Reitmayr	Austria de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
notrademark.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Zurück in die Heimat – von msquare	Germany de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
osb-alliance.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	OSBA – Open Source Business Alliance	Germany de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ha-neen.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Bodcast – Eine andere WordPress-Site.	de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jenkins.at ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	jenkins.at – personal, technical, fun	Austria de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nerdsonly.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	NerdsOnly – Eine andere WordPress-Site.	Germany de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nerdluecht.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Simon-Martin Schroeder – MSc Computer Science, Kiel University	Germany de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.