similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to austinagentics.com

Austinagentics alternatives & similar sites

Mat Mathews — Developer Communities → Revenue Engines — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
ozzu.co ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Ozzu® - Developer Community - Buy & Sell Digital Assets	Colombia en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ozzu.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Ozzu® - Developer Community - Buy & Sell Digital Assets	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
satoshium.dev ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Satoshium — Developer Layer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
saukr.dev ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	saukr — Developer Portfolio	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jacobmixon.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Jacob Mixon - Developer + Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
adamh.me ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Adam Heimowitz - Engineering Leader & Software Developer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dpe.org ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	The Home of Developer Productivity Engineering (DPE)	en	technology-and-computing WordPress Spree Commerce	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ownmydata.io ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Own My Data — Developer Portal & API	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
whoisdevops.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	$whois DevOps — Community	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dilumdesilva.dev ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Dilum De Silva — Google Developer Expert & Senior Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jasoncooper.dev ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Jason Cooper - Engineering Manager & Full-Stack Developer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
dileepkancherla.dev ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Dileep Kancherla \| Dell Boomi Developer & Integration Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
adityasinghania.tech ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	adityasinghania — Developer Portfolio	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bradenboucher.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Braden Boucher — Photonics Engineer & iOS Developer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
simonking.dev ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Simon King — Lead Developer & Technical Leader	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aeonaxy.org ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Aeonaxy — CS Books & Developer Resources	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mehranmazhar.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Mehran Mazhar — Senior Full-Stack .NET Developer & Blockchain Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jayblanchard.net ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Jay Blanchard \| Platform Engineering, DevOps Leadership, Developer Enablement	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.