similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to aufrichter.com

Aufrichter alternatives & similar sites

Stefan Aufrichter – Multidisciplinary Designer — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Design →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
jannawinkler.de ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	janna winkler – Multidisciplinary designer based in Berlin	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jennifer-alice.de ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	Multidisciplinary Brand Designer	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
vor-format.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	vorFormat – multidisciplinary studio	de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
vorformat.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	vorFormat – multidisciplinary studio	de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kepnik.de ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Ralf Kepnik - Integrated ,Multidisciplinary Design	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
joergsebald.de ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Jörg Sebald · Interdisciplinary Designer	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
3deluxe.de ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	– 3deluxe - Transdisciplinary Design –	Germany de	design Storyblok	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
a-m-t.net ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Home \| AMT \| The multidisciplinary creative agency	de	design Concrete5	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
joernbeyer.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Studio Jörn Beyer – Studio für multidisziplinäres Design	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ansgar-vollmer.de ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Ansgar Vollmer – Designer	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
andreasfisser.de ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	andreasdennerloehr.de \| I’m Andy, a multidisciplinary Designer and award winning Creative Director based in Munich, Germany.	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
andreasdennerloehr.de ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	andreasdennerloehr.de \| I’m Andy, a multidisciplinary Designer and award winning Creative Director based in Munich, Germany.	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
almeer.de ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Haitham Almeer – Product Designer	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sodastudios.ch ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Wir sind Soda Studios – ein multidisziplinäres Designstudio in Zürich	Switzerland de	design WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	email phone	none
alexanderfaller.de ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Alexander Faller – Product Designer	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ivanmolina.de ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Grafik Designer › Ivan Molina	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
katharinahengster.de ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Katharina Hengster – Brand Designer & Typografie	Germany de	design Webflow	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
janamatthaeus.de ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Jana Matthäus – Designerin	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.