similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to atilaoncode.blog

Atilaoncode alternatives & similar sites

Átila on Code | Code, testing and systems programming — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Programming Languages →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
spacelang.org ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	Space: Verified Systems Programming	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cnpp.dev ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Practical Programming	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
0xeb.net ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Shortjump! \| Reversing engineering, programming and what not…	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
allaroundprogrammer.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	All-Around Programmer - Programming Blog	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
egisca.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Egisca – Software Programming	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
clown-lang.org ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	The Go Programming Language	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
androidcode.ninja ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Android Code Ninja - Android Programming Tutorials by Mike Dalisay	en	programming-languages WordPress Sellfy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
afshinm.name ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Afshin \| Notes about programming, math and adventures	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
vlangprogramming.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Vlang Programming	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cstringdirect.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	CString Direct — Master C Programming, One String at a Time	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mikheev.me ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Andrey Mikheev' programming blog - Andrey Mikheev' programming blog	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
carbonprogramming.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Carbon Programming	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
eiffelprogramming.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Eiffel Programming	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
algonotes.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Algonotes - Algorithmic Notes on Competitive Programming	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
learnyapl.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Learn YAPL – Learn Yet Another Programming Language	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
csinfo360.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Programming Practice	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thejoyofprogramming.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	The Joy of Programming	en	programming-languages Ghost	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rorprogramming.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	RoR (Ruby on Rails) Programming	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.