similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to astac-eau.com

Astac Eau alternatives & similar sites

Astac-eau — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Environment →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
cbd.int ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Home \| Convention on Biological Diversity	en	biological-sciences Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
atonforestfellowship.org ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Aton Forest Fellowship – A scientific research fellowship created by ecologist Dr. Frank E. Egler	United States~ en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
esavoices.org ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	50 Voices \| Biodiversity Recovery \| Endangered Species Act	en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
africanbioservices.eu ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	African BioServices - African Ecology & Conservation	European Union en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cbshepard.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	CRITICAL ZONE PEDOLOGY LAB - Home	en	environment Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
chm-cbd.net ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	CHM National Clearing House \| CHM Network	en	environment Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
anaee.eu ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	AnaEE-ERIC – Analysis and Experimentation on Ecosystems	European Union en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
atlanticconservationpartnership.org ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	The Atlantic Conservation Partnership	en	biological-sciences WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
atlanticwildlifeconservation.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	The Atlantic Conservation Partnership	en	biological-sciences WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
erintspencer.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Erin T. Spencer	en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
esarecovery.org ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Dynamic Recovery – Web-based recovery plans for threatened and endangered species	en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
donnadim.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Donna Dimarchopoulou - Personal website	en	biological-sciences WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
downtoearthlabs.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Home \| Down to Earth Labs	en	environment	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ines-solutions.eu ↗	40 match 2 shared topics	Home \| INES	European Union en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ang-appenzell.ch ↗	40 match 2 shared topics	Appenzellische Naturwissenschaftliche Gesellschaft (ANG)	Switzerland en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 6
bio-c3.eu ↗	40 match 2 shared topics	Home - BIO-C3	European Union en	biological-sciences Liferay	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
catherinedallaire.com ↗	32 match 1 shared topics	Rédactrice Dallai \| Home	Canada~ en	environment WordPress WooCommerce	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lloydalter.com ↗	32 match 1 shared topics	Carbon Upfront! \| Lloyd Alter \| Substack	en	environment	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.