similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to asppdf.com

Asppdf alternatives & similar sites

AspPDF.com -- A Persits Component for PDF Management — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Software And Applications →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
splitmypdfs.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	SplitMyPDF.online - Effortless PDF Management	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thevisitorapp.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	VisitorLog - Smart Visitor Management for iPad	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
bakerzoneph.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	BakerzonePH — Order Management for Home Bakers	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
indiumapp.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Indium - Effortless Batch Management for DWG Files	en	software-and-applications	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
3gvideo.mobi ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Pixel Management Ltd.	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
newtargets.co.uk ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Job Management Software	United Kingdom en	software-and-applications WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
fenxiangditu.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Multica — Project Management for Human + Agent Teams	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
indiansquebec.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Multica — Project Management for Human + Agent Teams	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
luxlogcabin.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Multica — Project Management for Human + Agent Teams	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ontomedia.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	OntoMedia - semantic multimedia management for private users.	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thevista.app ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Vista: Simple SaaS Management for Solo and Small Teams	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
onewrapp.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Onewrapp.com \| Production Management Tool	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
cortado.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Cortado – Easy Mobile Device Management for iOS & Android	en	software-and-applications WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
feerio.io ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Feerio - Easy & flexible feedback management for your SaaS	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
onlinepdfmanager.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Online PDF Manager	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
samroseacademy.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Samroses Management System	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thisgoodbooking.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Sonah — Golf Management Software	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
samsai.io ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	React Student Management App	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.