similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to artizfaction.de

Artizfaction alternatives & similar sites

artizfaction design – Grafik Design München — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Design →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
design-on-arrival.de ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Grafik Design München \| DESIGN ON ARRIVAL \| Marcus Haas	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
as-grafik-design.de ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	as-grafik-design – Grafik Design und Prompt Design	Germany de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
demesdesign.de ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	demes design – Grafik. Marken. Design.	Germany de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
herrjacoby.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Martin Jacoby – Grafik Design	de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
design-angel.de ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Portfolio - Grafik-Design München	Germany de	design Jimdo	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dieblu.me ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	dieblume – Grafik Design Portfolio	de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dagmarbauer.de ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Dagmar Bauer Grafikdesign – Grafikdesign	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
demuth-design.de ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Demuth Design: Grafik Design Lösungen	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
delieradesign.de ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	DeLieraDesign – Grafik Design nach Maß – visuell kommunizieren	Germany de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
design-im-puls.de ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	design im puls – Grafikdesign & Art Direction	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
design-impuls.de ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	design im puls – Grafikdesign & Art Direction	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
annastehr-design.de ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Anna Stehr Design – Illustratorin und Grafik Designerin	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
annakiefer.de ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Art Direction & Grafik Design	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
polygrafica.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Grafische Lösungen - polygrafica ''' Grafik Design München	de	design Jimdo	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
herrlotz.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	HERR LOTZ \| Designbüro // Grafik-Design / München	de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
design-am-schloss.de ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Grafik Design – Dipl. Designerin DorotheaHelmke-Pillmann	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
antonmahringer.de ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Grafik Design & Art Direction \| Anton Mahringer, München \| Home	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
design-grafik.de ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	merzhäuser \| grafik + design – Gute Grafik. Bestes Design	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.