similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to ansible.pub

Ansible alternatives & similar sites

The Ansible | FAI | Substack — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
radiantdispatch.com ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	Xavi Benjamin \| Substack	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 2
bowtiedse.com ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	SE's Edge \| Substack	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 2
thelakehousepath.com ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	The Lakehouse Path \| Martin Debus \| Substack	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
newsaltroad.com ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	New Salt \| Substack	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
newnewis.com ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	The New New \| Brent Turner \| Substack	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thefounderparable.com ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	The Founder: A Cyberpunk Parable \| Substack	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
niborbin.com ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	Nib or Bin \| Substack	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pxr2.org ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	PXR2 \| Alin Mechenici \| Substack	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rajanand.net ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Rajanand’s Newsletter \| Substack	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
notboring.co ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Not Boring by Packy McCormick \| Substack	Colombia en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
brianmca.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	brianmca notes \| Substack	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
accelerateordie.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Accelerate or Die \| Matt Mireles \| Substack	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
anchorline.blog ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Anchorline Notes \| Substack	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
tycoworks.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	tycoworks \| Chris \| Substack	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
charity.wtf ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Charity Majors \| Substack	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
4good-finds.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	4-Good Finds \| Abi Bouhmaida \| Substack	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bioharmony.space ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	BioHarmony \| Jacob Foster \| Substack	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nichevaluelab.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	NicheValueLab's Substack \| Substack	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.