similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔎Similar Site SearchFind websites like any domain 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to andpec.tech

Andpec alternatives & similar sites

About | Into the nothingness — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
deadpix3l.me ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	DeadPix3l \| A blog about nothing. and code.	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
karla.moe ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Karlatemps' Blog - Nothing here	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kestron.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	About - Kestron	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
zsbahtiar.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	about - zsbahtiar	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
dbjanke.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	D. B. Janke \| A place to think about systems, software, and the culture around them.	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
modzelewski.dev ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	About	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
devmake.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Devmake \| Tech blog about random things that I find interesting	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
deviniarczuk.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	About me! \| deviniarczuk	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
debuganalyzer.net ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Debug Analyzer.NET \| Intelligent Debugger	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
narayanloke.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Narayan Loke – Deep diving into technology	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
devargument.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	DevArgument \| Participate in the noble cause of sharing knowledge	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
simonwittber.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	About Simon Wittber \| The professional experience of Simon Wittber.	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
curiousthing.org ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	A Curious Thing	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
derdilla.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	About: derdilla	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	full · 17
repochat.dev ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	repochat - chat about code \| test	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
forthevim.org ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	for the (neo)vim	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
githowto.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	GitHowTo: guided tutorial about Git	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mod-dotnet-bot.net ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Mod the dotnet-bot	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.