similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to an-pr.de

An Pr alternatives & similar sites

Public Relations & Marketing — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Advertising Industry →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
adam-partner.de ↗	78 match 2 shared topics	ADAM & PARTNER Marketing - Werbung - Public Relations	Germany de	advertising-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alphapr.de ↗	78 match 2 shared topics	Alpha Public Relations	Germany de	marketing-and-advertising	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alexander-klueh.de ↗	77 match 2 shared topics	N2L – Marketing & Public Relations	Germany de	marketing-and-advertising WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
amagi-pr.de ↗	75 match 2 shared topics	Home - amagi Public Relations	Germany de	advertising-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jenke-pr.de ↗	72 match 2 shared topics	Marion Jenke Public Relation	Germany de	advertising-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
blueloftcommunications.ch ↗	72 match 2 shared topics	Public Relations & Kommunikation \| Blue Loft Communications	Switzerland de	marketing-and-advertising	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
blueloft.ch ↗	72 match 2 shared topics	Public Relations & Kommunikation \| Blue Loft Communications	Switzerland de	marketing-and-advertising	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
blue-loft.ch ↗	72 match 2 shared topics	Public Relations & Kommunikation \| Blue Loft Communications	Switzerland de	marketing-and-advertising	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
2beecomm.de ↗	71 match 2 shared topics	2beecomm 2026 \| PUBLIC RELATIONS & KOMMUNIKATION	Germany de	advertising-industry WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
agentur-c2r.de ↗	71 match 2 shared topics	Christian Reichelt Werbung & Marketing	Germany de	marketing-and-advertising	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
janmarketing.de ↗	71 match 2 shared topics	Jan Marketing	Germany de	marketing-and-advertising	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ah-public.de ↗	71 match 2 shared topics	- ah kommunikation \| Agentur für Public Relations \| Hamburg	Germany de	advertising-industry Contao	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
anneheitmann.de ↗	71 match 2 shared topics	- ah kommunikation \| Agentur für Public Relations \| Hamburg	Germany de	advertising-industry Contao	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
anne-heitmann.de ↗	71 match 2 shared topics	- ah kommunikation \| Agentur für Public Relations \| Hamburg	Germany de	advertising-industry Contao	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
andreaseckelt.de ↗	71 match 2 shared topics	Andreas Eckelt Marketing- und Kommunikationsberatung	Germany de	marketing-and-advertising	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
f-m-marketing.com ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	FM Marketing	de	marketing-and-advertising	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ap-marketing-gmbh.de ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	AP Marketing	Germany de	marketing-and-advertising Squarespace	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
juniorsuite.de ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	noymedia marketing	Germany de	marketing-and-advertising	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.