similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to amaristat.com

Amaristat alternatives & similar sites

AMARISTAT – Statistics and Economic Research Institute — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Economy →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
case-research.eu ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	CASE – Center for Social and Economic Research	European Union en	economy WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
enas.org.uk ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	ENAS · Global Economic Research	United Kingdom en	economy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
chaosmacro.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Chaos Theory \| Macro Economic Research	en	economy Spree Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ehsanmousavi.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Ehsan Mousavi – Economics Researcher	en	economy WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
esrc.ac.uk ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) – UKRI	United Kingdom en	economy WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
objecon.org ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Home - The Objective Economics Institute	en	economy WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
econgeog.org.uk ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Economic Geography Research Group	United Kingdom en	economy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
2morrownomics.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	2morrownomics – Futurology, politics and economics	en	economy WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ibssr.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	A Global Research and Policy Institute Based in Bangladesh	en	economy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mebdi.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	MEBDI \| Minnesota Economics Big Data Institute	en	economy Squarespace Magento	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
economicsbrazilchina.com.br ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Home - Research Group of Economics Brazil China	Brazil en	economy WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
howard-friedman.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Howard Steven Friedman – statistician, economist, author, artist	en	economy WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
i4ide.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	I4IDE.org institute for international and development economics	en	economy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rcie-cn.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Research Center for International Economics @ UIBE	en	economy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
c2er.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	The Council for Community and Economic Research – Promoting excellence in community and economic research since 1961	en	economy WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cedrickeysselitz.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Cedric Keysselitz – Student of International Affairs and Economics	en	economy WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
carringtonccedc.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	CCEDC – Chamber of Commerce and Economic Development	en	economy WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mdamirhossen.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	MD. Amir Hossen \| Economist & Researcher	en	economy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.