similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to amara.design

Amara alternatives & similar sites

Amara Hulslander – Lead Product Designer — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
tufanemre.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Tufan Emre — Product Designer & Developer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
actualatom.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	James Seaborn - Product Design - Actual Atom	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gursiq.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Gurmeet Singh \| UX & Product Design Portfolio	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
qld-broadcast.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Broadcast Products - Quantum Leap Design	en	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
csmithfiles.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Caleb Smith \| Product Developer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jbradleyproductdesigns.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	JBradleyProductDesigns	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
guidaly.app ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Guidaly — Interactive product demos	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
paradoxdesign.com.au ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Paradox Design \| Digital and Physical Product Consultancy	Australia en	technology-and-computing	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dorcis.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Dorcy Shema • SaaS Product Developer	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mikesheehy.net ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Mike Sheehy \| Product Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
doubledelectrictx.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Comprehensive Guide to Electronic Product & Circuit Board Design	en	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rohayudraman.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Digital Product Portfolio	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
anomalist.design ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Anomalist Design	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bplgoodcom.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	BPLGoodcom Tech – Technology Products	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dorothyren.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Dorothy Ren \| Product & Tech	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bluein.green ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Product, Design & Engineering Partner \| BlueInGreen	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
0gstore.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	THE ZERO G INDEX – Product intelligence, indexed.	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
accessonlineforms.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Product Unavailable	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.