similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔎Similar Site SearchFind websites like any domain 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to alyshakassam.com

Alyshakassam alternatives & similar sites

Alysha Kassam – Philosopher of Science — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Science →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
katemaccord.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Kate MacCord – Historian and philosopher of science @ ASU	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cyrilleimbert.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Cyrille Imbert – Senior Researcher (CNRS) in philosophy of science	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
beautyofscience.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Beauty of Science	en	science Squarespace	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dbarack.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	David L Barack, Ph.D. – Philosopher and Neuroscientist	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
abitofastro.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	A Bit of Science	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
abitofhealth.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	A Bit of Science	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
abitofscience.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	A Bit of Science	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
abitoftech.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	A Bit of Science	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thatscienceguy.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Dr Ben Lewis – that science guy	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mcdonnellinitiativeatmbl.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	McDonnell Initiative @MBL – Transforming discovery through collaborations among historians, philosophers, and life scientists	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
amse.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	American Museum of Science and Energy – Inspire the Imagination	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
adjacentscience.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Adjacent Science	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
reellifescience.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	ReelLIFE SCIENCE	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
myfusimotors.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Scents of Science – Think different.	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
123science.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	123 Science	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
molecularviewbook.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Unlock the Wonders of Science with Molecular View Book	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ginaerrico.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Gina Errico – Science Communicator & Educator	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
theabcsofdatascience.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	The ABCs of Data Science - Very Young Professionals	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.