similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to aluplan.de

Aluplan alternatives & similar sites

Aluplan - Perfektion auf den Punkt gebracht! — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Design →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
aluplan-mosaiktechnik.de ↗	100 match 1 shared topics	Aluplan - Perfektion auf den Punkt gebracht!	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ab-designservice.de ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	AB Designservice – WERBUNG AUF DEN PUNKT.	Germany de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aufden.net ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Design – auf den Punkt. Professionell. Persönlich. Preiswert. Praktisch.	de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aufdenpunkt.net ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Design – auf den Punkt. Professionell. Persönlich. Preiswert. Praktisch.	de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
achimtrumpfheller.de ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Satz InDesign-Templates Corporate Design – Perfekte Layouts	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
huberinnovation.ch ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Huber Innovation GmbH – IDEEN PERFEKT REALISIERT	Switzerland de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bergstudios.ch ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Bergstudios – Design auf 1000 Metern	Switzerland de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
annett-grauel.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Willkommen auf der Internetpräsentation von Annett Grauel, Diplomdesignerin (FH)	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
janriemer.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Visuelle Kommunikation - Tabea Dietrich \| Jan Riemer	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
marcodemont.ch ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Design - Studio de Mont	Switzerland de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
jungleboard.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Jungleboard Design - Startseite	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
agnesberreth.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Agnes B // Art Direktion und Grafikdesign – Designportfolio	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
judithcajic.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Home - Judith Cajic Freelance Art Direktion München	Germany de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
vonferro.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	VON FERRO \| Branding & Design Agentur Wien	de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
punktpoesie.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Authentisches Design und Branding - Punktpoesie	de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
foundation-award-junior.ch ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Foundation Award Junior	Switzerland de	design	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
neuweiss.ch ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	neuweiss visuelle kommunikation – Bea Würgler	Switzerland de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
katrinkahl.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Portfolio - katrin kahl artdirektion & design	Germany de	design Jimdo	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.