similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to alt.org.uk

Alt alternatives & similar sites

Adult Literacy Trust — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Education →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
outsidetheboxliteracy.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Outside the Box Literacy - Home	en	education Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
highprogressliteracy.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	High Progress Literacy \|	en	education WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
medialiteracynow.org ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Media Literacy Now \| Media Literacy Now	en	education WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
launchingliteracyandlearning.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Home - Launching Literacy & Learning	en	education WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
culturalliteracy.net ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Cultural Literacy Research Network	en	education WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
95percentgroup.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Evidence-Based Literacy Solutions \| 95 Percent Group	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dgliteracy.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Dollar General Literacy Foundation	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
laliteracyacademy.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	LA Literacy Academy – Let your Home be the Classroom.	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
papyrusnews.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Papyrus News \| … on digital learning and literacy	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mbmla.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Macon-Bibb Mayor’s Literacy Alliance - Advocate - Support - Serve	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
laurusinstitute.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	The Laurus Trust	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
moralecologytrust.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Moral Ecology Trust \| Where Good Character Thrives	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
paklit.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Pakistan Literacy Fund – Educate a child, raise a nation.	en	education WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lassoliteracy.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Lasso Literacy – Sound Approach, Sound Learning, Sound Literacy	en	education WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
medienbildung.team ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Working Group on Educational Theory and Practices of Critical Computational Literacy	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
paperpulse.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Litora — Automated Research Paper Alerts for Literature Review	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
lawparkeducationaltrust.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Home - Law Park Educational Trust	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
medialiteracyafrica.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Media Literacy Development Foundation – Nurturing critical media consumers and creators	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.